REVIEW: Moonrise Kingdom
Directed By: Wes Anderson
“A live action cartoon” might seem like a damaging put-down
of a film conceived as an auteur driven independent project with pretensions of
sophistication and a booking as the opening film of the year’s Cannes Film
Festival but it is a genuine compliment intended to highlight the high degree
of formal control displayed by director Wes Anderson in his sixth feature film.
Dressed to nines and production designed to the gills, the
film offers up copious film-maker eccentrics and more reason to celebrate Wes Anderson’s
directing talents rather than his more widely praised writing and dressing
ones.
The story here is only a hook for another of Mr. Anderson’s
impressive visual displays as he lets loose his signature taste with the very
grass growing in the back of an already busy frame. Essentially a love story
between two pre-pubescent “difficult” teenagers who elope together sparking a
wild goose chase over their quaint island, the film is tailored to be an
extremely handsome fair tail style spectacle.
Bravura tracking shots open the film and are littered
throughout. The side tracking shots, capturing the characters in the foreground
as amusing mis-en-scene enlivens the in focus background, the film reminds of
the similar technique used in his previous film, a stop-motion animated film, inspiring
the comparison made in the first line of this review.
The actors have pride of place besides the carefully
designed furniture and costumes; they are equally well arranged and directed in
the frame. They each have a constantly amused or amusing persona and deliver
the quiet quip-y lines with just the required amount of poker-faced-ness. It
doesn’t get drier than Mr. Norton and Mr. Willis as ineffectual men in command.
The lead stars though, the aforementioned teen lovers are
camera friendly and easily rooted for. The boy with the fuzz just beginning to
grow on his upper lip has a brave pup-dog look which goes well with his
character while Kara Hayward looking considerably older than her
lover, blooms as a 60’s beauty just about to discover her sure to be enormous
and appealing sexuality. There is goofiness to the romance precisely because of
the imperfect balance between the physical attractiveness of the lead pair
which is nevertheless played very dry and poker-faced just like the rest of the
movie.
The film whooshes by at an easy 90 minutes (including the
credits) and remains a warm delight in memory. One remembers the many memorable
images and even the deeply invested finale where the film almost musters up an
intense poignancy as the fate of our lovers seems less than rosy than the rest
of the film indicated. The storm and flood sequence at the end of the movie has
to be considered a set-piece, almost an epic conclusion to a film of such
modest ambitions. Production values, including Mr. Desplat’s rambunctious
score, are superb across the board.
As rigorously composed Mr. Anderson’s frames are, they
almost seem like Zack Snyder like slavish recreations of existing graphic art
material. That is clearly not the case though seem to indicate that the story
boards for Mr. Anderson’s film would surely make great graphic novels. One is
left to wonder that if Mr. Anderson were to adapt a graphic novel, the results
wouldn’t be just as appealing.
4/5
Comments
Post a Comment